Which one does not belong to the set of qualifications of the Board Chairman and Members?

Which one does not belong to the set of qualifications of the Board Chairman and Members?

• A. A Filipino Citizen
• B. None
• C. A resident of the Philippines
• D. A registered Chemical Engineer who has been in active practice for at least ten years

Answer: (A)

The important idea is what the board wants in someone who can sit as Chair or as a member: they must have solid professional standing and a strong tie to the country through residency. The explicit eligibility criteria for the Board Chair and Members are that the person is a resident of the Philippines and a registered chemical engineer who has been in active practice for at least ten years. Citizenship is generally a given requirement for professionals serving on Philippine regulatory boards, but when the question asks which item does not belong in the set of qualifications, the focus is on the explicit, testable qualifications listed. Being a resident of the Philippines and having ten years of active practice as a registered chemical engineer are concrete, verifiable qualifications, while “A Filipino Citizen” is a broader precondition that is not specified as a separate qualification in the same way. Therefore, the choice stating “A Filipino Citizen” does not fit as one of the explicit qualifications in the set. The other two items clearly align with the statutory requirements.

The important idea is what the board wants in someone who can sit as Chair or as a member: they must have solid professional standing and a strong tie to the country through residency. The explicit eligibility criteria for the Board Chair and Members are that the person is a resident of the Philippines and a registered chemical engineer who has been in active practice for at least ten years. Citizenship is generally a given requirement for professionals serving on Philippine regulatory boards, but when the question asks which item does not belong in the set of qualifications, the focus is on the explicit, testable qualifications listed. Being a resident of the Philippines and having ten years of active practice as a registered chemical engineer are concrete, verifiable qualifications, while “A Filipino Citizen” is a broader precondition that is not specified as a separate qualification in the same way. Therefore, the choice stating “A Filipino Citizen” does not fit as one of the explicit qualifications in the set. The other two items clearly align with the statutory requirements.