The statement that a Chemical Engineer shall not review the work of another Chemical Engineer who is not employed without the prior notice of the employed engineer; this assertion is:

The statement that a Chemical Engineer shall not review the work of another Chemical Engineer who is not employed without the prior notice of the employed engineer; this assertion is:

• A. True
• B. Both parties must consent
• C. For any review
• D. False

Answer: (D)

In professional ethics, the key idea is that any review of a colleague’s work must be authorized and conducted with proper respect for confidentiality and the client’s or project owner’s permission. There isn’t a universal rule that a reviewer must first be notified by the employed engineer before reviewing work done by a non-employed engineer. What matters is having the appropriate authorization and clear scope, plus safeguarding confidential information and avoiding conflicts of interest. Therefore, the statement is not correct; reviews can proceed when proper consent and authorization are in place, rather than requiring prior notice from the employed engineer.

In professional ethics, the key idea is that any review of a colleague’s work must be authorized and conducted with proper respect for confidentiality and the client’s or project owner’s permission. There isn’t a universal rule that a reviewer must first be notified by the employed engineer before reviewing work done by a non-employed engineer. What matters is having the appropriate authorization and clear scope, plus safeguarding confidential information and avoiding conflicts of interest. Therefore, the statement is not correct; reviews can proceed when proper consent and authorization are in place, rather than requiring prior notice from the employed engineer.